# EAO engineering verification record

Record date: 28 September 2026 (UTC)

This record describes automated engineering evidence for one exact version of EAO, the Enterprise Autonomous Orchestrator. It is not a customer case study, certification, production acceptance record or performance claim.

## Exact version

- Repository state: merged `main`
- Commit: `54d03bda100e93381b96bb1d0a93a04abd864aae`
- Commit subject: `Merge pull request #59 — connect mission handoff to runtime admission`
- Foundation CI run: `36364689242`
- Single-node container release run: `36364689218`

The repository and workflow logs are private. IgniteX can provide reviewed evidence during a qualified technical evaluation, subject to confidentiality and access controls.

## What completed successfully

The Foundation CI workflow completed successfully for the exact commit above. The single-node release workflow also completed its verification and immutable-image build jobs successfully.

The recorded release-verification steps covered:

1. locked dependency installation;
2. architecture and contract validation;
3. policy and container-runtime tests;
4. synthetic user-acceptance journeys;
5. runtime database-role provisioning and migration;
6. PostgreSQL restart persistence and tenant row-level security;
7. single-node Compose validation;
8. deployment-script validation; and
9. an immutable runtime image build.

These are automated checks in the CI/release environment. Synthetic UAT means test journeys using controlled test data; it does not mean customer acceptance.

## What this record does not prove

The deployment job in the same release workflow was skipped. This record does not establish:

- deployment or acceptance in a named customer or IgniteX environment;
- model quality, GPU or target-hardware throughput;
- availability of every agent pack, connector or user interface;
- high availability, disaster recovery, penetration-test clearance or production resilience;
- customer business outcomes, savings, accuracy or service-level performance; or
- completion of the unmerged work that existed after the named commit.

## How a buyer should use this evidence

Treat this as a code-and-CI checkpoint. For a pilot, request a pinned build, a named environment, the agreed integrations, representative success and failure cases, an operator-visible trace, recovery evidence and signed acceptance criteria. Deployment acceptance should be recorded separately from automated build verification.

## Reproduction and disclosure notes

- The commit and run identifiers above are stable evidence references.
- Secrets, credentials, private source and customer data are not included in this public record.
- A future record should supersede this one only when a new exact commit and its completed checks are verified.

Prepared by IgniteX Solutions from repository and workflow evidence. AI assistance was used to structure this public summary; the evidence identifiers and job outcomes were checked against the connected GitHub repository on 30 September 2026.
